Aman : Hare krishna Prabhu, so my question was, we see many references that ISKCONites provide but no longer exist today in those literatures, why is it so? Does this mean gaudiyas fabricated some lies? Please do not be offended, i am asking in the general perception. For example verses which i see y'all quoting from are Bhagavat Purana. Adi Puran. Kurma Puran. Garuda Puran Narasimha Puran. Padma Purana. Narada Purana. Brahma Purana. Bhavisya Purana. Agni Purana. Matsya Purana. Vayu Purana. Markendaya Purana. Varaha Purana. Puranaamana Purana. Upa Purana. Ananta Samhita. Mahabharata. Atharva Veda. Sama Veda. Chaitanya Upanisad. Chandogya Upanishad. Svetasvara Upanishad. Purusa-Bodini Upanisad. Out of these, many veres dont exist in those scriptures. Although verses that are existing till now, no doubt clear everything and proves sri Gauranga to be none else than Krishna himself, but i just had this particular doubt. Devotee : It is not unique that an Acharya gives ref
Aman : Hare Krishna Prabhu _/|\_ Devotee : Hare krishna_/|\_ so had another doubt? Aman : yes, i do agree with our yesterdays discussion, and i accept sri chaitanya mahaprabhu to be krishna himself. But i want to inquire a bit more. Devotee : Sure Prabhu Aman : thankyou, why isn't mahaprabhu mentioned clearly like other incarnations? Devotee : Because he is a hidden incarnation. SB 7.9.38-- "In this way, my Lord, You appear in various incarnations as a human being, an animal, a great saint, a demigod, a fish or a tortoise, thus maintaining the entire creation in different planetary systems and killing the demoniac principles. According to the age, O my Lord, You protect the principles of religion. In the Age of Kali, however, You do not assert Yourself as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and therefore You are known as Triyuga, or the Lord who appears in three yugas." Naradiya Purana 5.47: The Lord Said : Concealing my real identity, O vipra